?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

NYT goes after Clinton

In a series of OpEd pieces, the NYT has gone on the war path against Clinton, arguing her quest for the White House is defeated but she refuses to realize it. They also express the view that her continued attacks on Obama could destroy any chance of the Dems winning the White House. The increased rancor in the nomination process has also got people on edge that the Congress could be lost.

The end of the last article is interesting - Do the Clintons want to be remembered as the Naders of 2008? I have to admit that has become the predominant thought in my mind. Their negativity has soured me on both of them at this point.

The Long Defeat

Hillary or Nobody

Obama, Clinton - and Echos of Nader?

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
cowboymarine
Mar. 27th, 2008 06:25 am (UTC)
The Long Defeat from David Brooks? Article aside... that dude has been wrong on everything of value in the past 6 years - particularly the war.
boaltie2004
Mar. 27th, 2008 04:40 pm (UTC)
Hmmm...off hand I don't remember any of his OpEds on the war. In general, his social policy pieces are a bit left of field for me (not always but mostly).
cowboymarine
Mar. 27th, 2008 06:51 pm (UTC)
He is a neocon for sure.
boaltie2004
Mar. 28th, 2008 02:08 am (UTC)
He does seem to be on the conservative end of the NYT columnist spectrum, but not not a wide-eyed freaky conservative. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any articles he's written on Iraq.
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

February 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow